Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.203 IF 1.203
  • IF 5-year value: 1.203 IF 5-year 1.203
  • CiteScore value: 0.98 CiteScore 0.98
  • SNIP value: 0.920 SNIP 0.920
  • SJR value: 0.390 SJR 0.390
  • IPP value: 0.89 IPP 0.89
  • h5-index value: 11 h5-index 11
  • Scimago H index value: 23 Scimago H index 23
Supported by
Logo Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology Logo Leibniz Association
Arch. Anim. Breed., 61, 143-151, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-61-143-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Original study
27 Mar 2018
Q method to map the diversity of stakeholder viewpoints along agricultural innovation systems: a case study on cattle genetic improvement in Niger
Seyni Siddo1,2, Nassim Moula1, Issa Hamadou1,2, Moumouni Issa3, Salissou Issa1, Marichatou Hamani3, Pascal Leroy1, and Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux1 1Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, avenue de Cureghem, 6, 4000 Liege, Belgium
2National Institute of Agronomic Research of Niger, P.O. Box 429 Niamey, Niger
3Faculty of Agronomy, University Abdou Moumouni, P.O. Box 10 960 Niamey, Niger
Abstract. The complex balance between innovation and conservation regarding animal genetic resources makes it difficult to find mutually accepted improvement pathways between breeders, government agencies, and research and education institutions. This study maps stakeholder viewpoints on cattle genetic improvement in Niger using the Q method. Fifty-three statements derived from expert opinions and focus group interviews were ranked by 22 respondents along a seven-grade scale expressing their degree of approval. The Q method reveals a limited consensus on development goals, overall strategy, and the present context of operation. Beyond this consensus, three discourses are identified that express distinct attitudes regarding the balance between conservation and progress, leading to distinct strategies. The first discourse fits with a modernist vision and government strategies established in the 2000s based on exotic crossbreeding and improved purebred Azawak. The second discourse lines up with the previous livestock development strategy of Niger (before 2000) based on indigenous breeds. The third discourse represents a conservationist vision, with minor importance in the present sampling. Tentative observations are proposed on the consequences of this divide in opinions on livestock policies in Niger, including extension. The Q method appears effective in identifying the concerns of stakeholders on complex agricultural innovation topics. As a sensing tool to follow-up policy implementation in similarly complex agricultural topics, the Q method may inform adaptive extension and education strategies.
Citation: Siddo, S., Moula, N., Hamadou, I., Issa, M., Issa, S., Hamani, M., Leroy, P., and Antoine-Moussiaux, N.: Q method to map the diversity of stakeholder viewpoints along agricultural innovation systems: a case study on cattle genetic improvement in Niger, Arch. Anim. Breed., 61, 143-151, https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-61-143-2018, 2018.
Download
Short summary
The complex balance between innovation and conservation regarding animal genetic resources makes it difficult to find mutually accepted improvement pathways between breeders, government agencies, and research and education institutions. This study maps stakeholder viewpoints on cattle genetic improvement in Niger using the Q method, which appears effective in identifying the concerns of stakeholders on complex agricultural innovation topics.
The complex balance between innovation and conservation regarding animal genetic resources makes...
Share