Journal cover Journal topic
Archives Animal Breeding Archiv Tierzucht
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.203 IF 1.203
  • IF 5-year value: 1.203 IF 5-year 1.203
  • CiteScore value: 0.98 CiteScore 0.98
  • SNIP value: 0.920 SNIP 0.920
  • SJR value: 0.390 SJR 0.390
  • IPP value: 0.89 IPP 0.89
  • h5-index value: 11 h5-index 11
  • Scimago H index value: 23 Scimago H index 23
Supported by
Logo Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology Logo Leibniz Association
Volume 47, issue 3 | Copyright
Arch. Anim. Breed., 47, 249-263, 2004
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-47-249-2004
© Author(s) 2004. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  10 Oct 2004

10 Oct 2004

Vergleichsuntersuchungen zur Ultraschall-Speckdickenmessung beim Schwein im Rahmen der Eigenleistungsprüfung

S. Müller1 and S. Polten2 S. Müller and S. Polten
  • 1Thüringer Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Außenstelle Clausberg, Am Rennsteig 3, 99819 Oberellen, OT Clausberg, Germany
  • 2Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Gartenbau Sachsen-Anhalt, Zentrum für Technik und Tierhaltung, Lindenstraße 18, 39606 Iden, Germany

Abstract. Title of the paper: Comparative investigations for ultrasonic fat thickness measurements of pigs at the performance testing
In two series (serie 1: N = 62 animals; serie 2: N = 26 animals, 22 persons) we have done investigations to specific differences for tools and persons during measurements of fat thickness of living pigs by ultrasonic. Our aim was to explain the causes and the effect of specific differences and to deduce consequences for the performance testing of boars and sows in our breeding companies.

In serie 1 there were measured with four ultrasonic tools with different specifications. We find significant differences, which can be up to 4 mm in order of the ultrasonic tool. Especially, measurements with the Lean-Meater, Level 2 suggest a fat thickness, which leads to a clear underestimation of the fat thickness of slaughtered animals. Between the A-Scan-Ultrasonic-tools we can find the following range in the middle fat thickness: Lean-Meater-Level 2 (13.1 mm) < Lean-Meater-Level 3 (13.9 mm) < USN-Tools (15.2 mm) < Piglog105 (Level "Normal") (16.8 mm). All proved tools reflects the degree of fatty degeneration, measured by fat thickness from classification, with a high precision (R > 0.8–0.9).

Download & links
Download
Citation
Share